Weekly Trader's Outlook

Stocks Attempt to Stabilize as Treasury's Buyback Relief Fades and Yields Resume Their Climb

August 21, 2026 Jim Ferraioli
Stocks are attempting to stabilize after a choppy week for risk assets, with Treasury yields pulling back mid-week after the Treasury Department announced plans to increase purchases of longer-term securities.

The Week That Was

If you read last week's blog, you might recall that Nate had a "Slightly Bullish" outlook for the market this week, with a secondary forecast for "Higher Volatility" given the potential macro and geopolitical catalysts on the calendar. Overall, that forecast proved reasonably accurate. Stocks largely extended their advance and continued to grind higher, although trading was not without periods of volatility. Treasury yields remained elevated, particularly on the long end of the curve, and investors continued to monitor developments in the Middle East. Despite these concerns, equity markets demonstrated resilience as strong technical trends, supportive sentiment, and continued risk appetite helped offset the headwinds. Volatility remained relatively subdued, with the VIX falling to an eight-month low during the week, suggesting investors have grown increasingly comfortable with both the macro backdrop and geopolitical risks. Looking back, the market largely followed the "melt-up" script Nate highlighted last week, with stocks continuing to push higher despite several reasons for caution.

Outlook for Next Week

At the time of this writing (12:40 PM ET)

I will provide an overall “modestly cautious” forecast for stocks next week, since the end of summer tends to be seasonally week time for markets, on top of continued uncertainty amid the Iran conflict, all while bond yields appear to be resuming their selloff. What could challenge my forecast? While there are certainty risks, many of these risks have been in place all year, and amid a strong backdrop of earnings growth across the entire US stock market, strong economic data, it wouldn’t surprise me if the market continued to look through the risks.

Other Potential Market-Moving Catalysts

Economic:

  • Monday 8/24: Chicago Fed National Activity Index
  • Tuesday 8/25: ADP Weekly Employment Change, Philadelphia Fed Non-Manufacturing Activity, Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index, New Home Sales, and Consumer Confidence
  • Wednesday 8/26: MBA Mortgage Applications, Personal Income & Spending, PCE and Core PCE, Durable Goods, 2Q26 GDP (second reading), Personal Consumption, Capital Goods Orders
  • Thursday 8/27:.Trade Balance, Retail Inventories, Initial Jobless Claims, Kansas City Fed Manufacturing Activity
  • Friday 8/28: Chicago PMI, University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment, Preliminary Benchmark Payrolls Revision

Earnings:

  • Monday (8/24): None
  • Tuesday (8/25): Dicks Sporting Goods (DKS), Zoom Communications (ZM), Intuit (INTU)
  • Wednesday (8/26): NVIDIA (NVDA), Okta (OKTA), Crowdstrike Holdings (CRWD), Synopsys (SNPS), Veeva Systems (VEEV), Salesforce (CRM), HP Inc (HP), Standard Nuclear (STDN)
  • Thursday (8/27): Dollar General (DG), Dollar Tree (DLTR), AutoDesk (ADSK), Workday (WDAY), Marvell Technology (MRVL), Affirm Holdings (AFRM)
  • Friday (8/28): Hyperliquid Strategies Inc (PURR), Hub Group (HUBG)

Economic Data, Rates & the Fed

There was a mixed bag of economic data this week, headlined by a hawkish tilt in the July FOMC minutes, which showed a 9-3 vote to hold rates steady with "many" officials flagging that a hike could still be needed if inflation doesn't ease. The labor market continued to hold up, with initial jobless claims coming in slightly better than expected at 206K. The bigger surprise came from manufacturing, as the Philadelphia Fed's index blew past expectations to hit its highest level since April 2021, a reading corroborated by strong S&P Global PMI data showing services activity expanding at its fastest pace since 2022. Here's a breakdown of the reports:

  • FOMC Minutes (Wednesday, July 28-29 meeting): Revealed a 9-3 vote to hold rates at 3.50%-3.75%, with "many" participants indicating a rate hike might still be necessary if inflation fails to ease.
  • Initial Jobless Claims (Thursday): Came in at 206K, slightly below the 210K consensus and down from the prior week's 212K, reinforcing that the labor market remains resilient for now.
  • Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index (Thursday, August reading): Surged to 47.4 from 41.4 in July — the highest level since April 2021 — crushing expectations of a decline to roughly 25. Nearly 57% of firms reported increased activity vs. only 10% reporting declines.
  • S&P Global US PMIs: Both the Manufacturing and Services PMI came registered in expansion again this month, with services activity expanding at the fastest pace since 2022.

Longer-term U.S. Treasury yields pushed higher this week, which resulted in some steepening of the curve, before finding some support as the Treasury announced buybacks of longer-dated maturities. Collin Martin, Head of Fixed Income Research and Strategy at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, is skeptical that the buyback program will provide lasting relief. His core view is that buybacks won't solve the deep-rooted issues — including U.S. government debt — that are pushing yields higher. He argues that over the longer term, the Fed and Treasury will need to address their policy challenges head-on, or risk losing credibility.

Market expectations around a potential rate hike from the Federal Reserve imply a 40% chance of a rate hike at the September FOMC meeting, though not much has changed on the broader futures curve over the past week. Fed watchers will be paying attention to news out of the Fed's annual Jackson Hole symposium.

Technical Take

Momentum continues to take a breather, with the Morgan Stanley US Momentum Index trading lower throughout the week. The selloff in government bonds has been impacting the momentum trade, potentially due to the large number of AI-related companies that have been trading in the momentum basket. As they have begun to look to debt financing for more of their capex, the increase in borrowing costs may be impacting their market valuations.

Line showing the Morgan Stanley US Momentum Index along with its 50-day, 100-day and 200-day moving averages.

Source: Bloomberg L.P.

Cryptocurrencies

The Bitwise 10 Large Crypto Index is up 25% since last Friday, with bitcoin up 23% and ether up 28% at the time of writing. Earlier in the week the CFTC announced Reg Crypto, while the Treasury announced intentions to buy back long-dated bonds, sparking a short squeeze in bitcoin.

As of a week ago, the weighted average of shorts was near $72k, while that of longs was near $62k. At $65,000, a 10% move higher would have put $10B in short open interest at risk of liquidation, while a 10% move lower would have put about $7B in longs at risk of liquidation. It's important to note that these are estimates and past short squeezes have typically liquidated less than these estimated amounts, while long flushes have often liquidated more. Wednesday and Thursday saw over $2 billion in levered shorts liquidated, with more liquidations occurring today.

Prior to the most recent short squeeze, the highest concentration of nearby shorts had a weighted liquidation center of ~$72,000

A line chart with the price of bitcoin, and the price of the weighted average of nearby short future clusters and long future clusters

Source: Bloomberg, Glassnode, Schwab as of 8/15/2026.

Prior to the squeeze, there was up to $10 billion in shorts at risk of getting liquidated in a squeeze

A line chart which shows the estimated value of long or short open interest within 10% of spot bitcoin prices.

Source: Bloomberg, Glassnode, Schwab as of 8/15/2026.

The squeeze continued overnight, with bitcoin nearly reaching $80,000 this morning. While short squeezes are typically short-lived, and the rally may need to digest some of these fast gains, it may have ended the debate as to whether the low of the bear market was in. Since reaching $60,000 in early February, bitcoin has held that level over the past six months. Now ten months from the October 2025 peak, the bears may be capitulating following this squeeze. Bitcoin is now above the active investor cost basis ($76,000), a measure of the average cost paid by investors who acquired bitcoin in secondary markets. The ETF cost basis still sits near $83,000. A sustained hold above these levels would indicate that the average bitcoin investor is now at a profit, which has historically been a signal that more levered exposure to bitcoin, such as Digital Asset Treasury companies, may become more attractive relative to spot. An updated measure of short clusters suggests there is less risk of liquidations around these price levels following the short squeeze.

There is less of an imbalance between long and short liquidation clusters following the short squeeze

A bar chart that shows the distribution of long and short clusters relative to bitcoin's current price.

Source: Bloomberg, Schwab as of 8/21/2006.

Prior to this week's action, bitcoin's futures curve had begun to draw attention in recent weeks from market participants. Looking at the positioning of large speculators, they are currently net long bitcoin futures contracts. That has led some market participants to posit that institutional investors have turned tactically bullish on bitcoin, since traditionally they are net short futures. This thesis appears to be incorrect.

Large speculators are net long CME bitcoin futures

A line chart that shows the net position of large non-commercial futures investors (speculators)

Source: Bloomberg, Schwab as of 8/15/2026.

The futures curve is currently in backwardation. This is a relatively rare occurrence, occurring less than 25% of the time since futures launched on the CME. Bitcoin futures tend to be in contango most of the time. Following the release of institutional investors' 13F filings, there were some noteworthy investors who took positions in cryptocurrencies; however, broadly, most hedge funds are unlikely to be taking a directional bet. They are simply repositioning the basis trade based on the current futures curve. Even if they were taking a bullish bet, historically owning spot when the futures curve is in backwardation has not been a good strategy compared to a buy-and-hold strategy across all periods, though past performance is no guarantee of future results.

A buy-and-hold strategy has outperformed holding only during periods of backwardation

A line chart that shows the performance of a buy-and-hold strategy, and a strategy that only holds when bitcoin futures are in backwardation

Source: Bloomberg, Glassnode, Schwab.

This is not meant to be a recommendation for a buy-and-hold strategy, but rather to help illustrate what investors are actually doing during periods of backwardation. Institutional investors have consistently used futures to conduct cash-and-carry trades (the basis trade). The launch of spot bitcoin exchange-traded products resulted in more investors entering the space, reducing the annualized yields earned on this trade. Today's net long demand by large speculators for futures may reflect a repositioning of the basis trade based on the relative lack of demand in spot markets. Typically, investors short futures — which historically have traded at a premium to spot when the curve is in contango — while holding an instrument that provides spot exposure. In other periods of low demand, which have often coincided with bear markets, investors take long positions in futures and short spot. This cash-and-carry strategy, which provides market-neutral exposure, has consistently been profitable, though past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The basis trade has historically been a profitable market-neutral strategy

A line chart showing the growth of $1 million using a cash-and-carry strategy

Source: Bloomberg, Glassnode, Schwab.

Exploring some other futures-based strategies, a systematic calendar spread approach did not yield strong results, but there are some caveats with this analysis. Deferred futures pairs did exhibit attractive Sharpe ratios, likely a result of low liquidity and stale prices. Near-term contracts resulted in negative Sharpe ratios after accounting for transaction costs. This does not mean that this strategy cannot be used profitably — just that a systematic approach did not yield consistently profitable results. Fundamental analysis could be used to identify potential mispricing in the liquid calendar spreads, which could result in higher Sharpe ratios.

A systematic approach of trading calendar spreads showed negative Sharpe ratios after transaction costs, while further-dated illiquid spreads produced the illusion of strong performance

A bar chart showing the Sharpe ratios of different calendar spreads using a systematic backtest

Source: Bloomberg, Glassnode, Schwab.

Finally, looking at forward bitcoin performance based on futures curve regimes shows that the best performance occurs when the market is in contango, which is the case the majority of the time. What is the investment takeaway? Hedge funds are not "bullish" on bitcoin here, but as the curve shifts to contango, that could result in buying pressure in spot markets. Given the backwardated curve, investors using cash-and-carry strategies are currently long futures and short spot. As those positions are closed out, buying will occur in the spot market, which could put pressure on short futures positions.

Forward returns were strongest when the futures curve was in contango

 
 
Futures Regime % of Time Average Forward 30-Day Return (%) Median Forward 30-Day Return (%) Average Forward 60-Day Return (%) Median Forward 60-Day Return (%) Average Forward 90-Day Return (%) Median Forward 90-Day Return (%)
Deep backwardation 17% -0.3 -0.2 4 -4.4 13.6 -3.6
Shallow backwardation 8% 4.8 3.5 10.4 -0.6 20.9 0.1
Transition to contango 6% 6.7 4.9 8.7 -0.3 17.4 3.4
Contango 69% 6.5 1.9 14.7 3.7 24 4.4

Market Breadth

The Bloomberg chart below shows the current performance of the S&P 500 Equal-Weighted Index relative to the performance of the S&P 500 Market-Cap-Weighted Index. Since May, the equal-weighted index has been outperforming the cap-weighted index, indicating that market breadth has been strong over this period.

Line showing the S&P 500 Equal-Weighted Index along with its 50-day, 100-day and 200-day moving averages.

Source: Bloomberg L.P.

Options carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Certain requirements must be met to trade options through Schwab. Please read the Options Disclosure Document titled "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options." before considering any option transaction. Call Schwab at 1-800-435-4000 for a current copy. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

Futures and futures options trading involves substantial risk and is not suitable for all investors. Please read the Risk Disclosure Statement for Futures and Options prior to trading futures products.

Investing involves risks, including loss of principal. Hedging and protective strategies generally involve additional costs and do not assure a profit or guarantee against loss.

The information here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The type of securities and investment strategies mentioned may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review a security transaction for his or her own particular situation. Data here is obtained from what are considered reliable sources; however, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

All references to subjects (securities, indexes, futures contracts, and options contracts) were derived based on screens conducted by the writer for certain anomalous activity such as volumes, volatility and other related market data. As needed for brevity, the writer may have applied discretion when choosing among screen outputs for inclusion. Such discretion may have been based on news reports or other considerations of public interest. The views or opinions are those of the writer, and are subject to change without notice. All referenced subjects were chosen for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered recommendations, offers to sell, or solicitations of offers to purchase.

Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author's views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the author's opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting market, economic, business, and other conditions.

This information does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for specific individualized tax, legal, or investment planning advice. Where specific advice is necessary or appropriate, Schwab recommends consultation with a qualified tax advisor, CPA, financial planner, or investment manager.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Cryptocurrency-related products carry a substantial level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Investments in cryptocurrencies are relatively new, highly speculative, and may be subject to extreme price volatility, illiquidity, and increased risk of loss, including your entire investment in the fund. Spot markets on which cryptocurrencies trade are relatively new and largely unregulated, and therefore, may be more exposed to fraud and security breaches than established, regulated exchanges for other financial assets or instruments. Some cryptocurrency-related products use futures contracts to attempt to duplicate the performance of an investment in cryptocurrency, which may result in unpredictable pricing, higher transaction costs, and performance that fails to track the price of the reference cryptocurrency as intended. Please read more about risks of trading cryptocurrency futures here.

Schwab does not recommend the use of technical analysis as a sole means of investment research.

Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and cannot protect against losses in a declining market.

Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

Commodity-related products carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Commodity-related products may be extremely volatile, illiquid and can be significantly affected by underlying commodity prices, world events, import controls, worldwide competition, government regulations, and economic conditions.

All corporate names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For additional information, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions.

*Schwab Network is brought to you by Charles Schwab Media Productions Company ("CSMPC"). CSMPC, < Charles Schwab Futures and Forex LLC,> and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. are separate but affiliated subsidiaries of The Charles Schwab Corporation. CSMPC is not a financial advisor, registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or futures commission merchant.

0826-ZX5C